Tilwith Di Girolami vs Emily Welker Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L L W W L W L
Form
W L W W L L W W W LHead-To-Head: Girolami 1 - 0 Welker
They have played 3 sets in total, with Girolami winning 2 and Welker winning 1. The last match between Girolami and Welker was at the W15 Alkmaar, 27-06-2024, Second, Clay with Tilwith Di Girolami getting the victory 4-6 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tilwith Di Girolami | 1 |
| Emily Welker | 0 |
W15 Alkmaar(27-06-2024)
4
6
6
4
6
2
| Girolami | Stats | Welker |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (3-3) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 849 | Ranking | 814 |
| 625 | Highest Rank | 593 |
| 21 | Age | 24 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 1 |
| 51% (89-84) | Career Total W/L | 55% (130-108) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Vukic VS Nishikori PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Boulter VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Tilwith Di Girolami
Player
Emily Welker
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
49%
(
25 of
51)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
47%
(
35 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
87)
83
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 12 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:27:0 | Average Match Time | 2:27:0 |
| 69% (51/74) | 1st Serve % | 68% (59/87) |
| 49% (25/51) | 1st Serve Win % | 49% (29/59) |
| 61% (14/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (14/28) |
| 62% (8/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 67% (6/9) |
| 51% (44/87) | Return Points Win % | 47% (35/74) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tilwith Di Girolami Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Lea Ma
Player
Tilwith Di Girolami
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
77%
(
51 of
66)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tilwith Di Girolami
Player
Fiona Crawley
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
13%
(
2 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
6 of
6)
55%
(
35 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
53 of
91)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kayla Cross
Player
Tilwith Di Girolami
54%
(
37 of
69)
1st Serve %
82%
(
41 of
50)
6
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
2
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tilwith Di Girolami
Player
Natsuho Arakawa
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
73%
(
35 of
48)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Haruna Arakawa
Player
Tilwith Di Girolami
62%
(
58 of
94)
1st Serve %
77%
(
58 of
75)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
48%
(
45 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
42 of
75)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ilay Yoruk
Player
Tilwith Di Girolami
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
85%
(
60 of
71)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
41 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tilwith Di Girolami
Player
Denislava Glushkova
91%
(
48 of
53)
1st Serve %
86%
(
59 of
69)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
100%
(
5 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tilwith Di Girolami
Player
Anastasiia Gureva
85%
(
88 of
103)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
9
60%
(
53 of
88)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
8 of
32)
38%
(
8 of
21)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
43 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
46 of
87)
106
Total Points Won
84
|
6-0 6-7(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tilwith Di Girolami
Player
Lavinia Luciano
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
25%
(
4 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
30 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Emily Welker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Fabienne Gettwart
Player
Emily Welker
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve %
58%
(
18 of
31)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
15 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
90%
(
28 of
31)
52
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Rose Marie Nijkamp
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
48%
(
28 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Anastasiia Firman
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
44%
(
21 of
48)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
7
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mathilde Lollia
Player
Emily Welker
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
70%
(
67 of
96)
-
Aces
-
11
Double Faults
5
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
20%
(
5 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
54%
(
45 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
54 of
96)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Anna Linn Puls
62%
(
66 of
107)
1st Serve %
54%
(
46 of
85)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
47 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(2) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Emily Welker
48%
(
43 of
89)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
1
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
57%
(
26 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Alexia Lavinia Puiac
39%
(
21 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
48%
(
10 of
21)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
56%
(
30 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Emily Welker
38%
(
18 of
48)
1st Serve %
66%
(
25 of
38)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Alexia-Shara Iancu
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
65%
(
24 of
37)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
51
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51% (89/84) | Win/Loss | 55% (130/108) |
| 52% (203/186) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (290/251) |
| 52% (1864/1738) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (2502/2352) |
| 56% (32/25) | Hard Win/Loss | 55% (62/50) |
| 50% (51/50) | Clay Win/Loss | 52% (57/53) |
| 40% (6/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 69% (11/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 56 | Aces Total | 38 |
| 0.35 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 616 | Total Double Faults | 477 |
| 1:30:23 | Average Match Time | 1:18:57 |
| 442.43 | Average Opponent Rank | 435 |
| 72% (7450/10403) | 1st Serve % | 70% (7923/11383) |
| 57% (4218/7450) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (4361/7923) |
| 41% (1205/2953) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (1468/3459) |
| 49% (711/1453) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (821/1596) |
| 48% (5121/10662) | Return Points Win % | 49% (5655/11536) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (30/33) | Challenger W/L | 49% (37/38) |
| 54% (59/51) | Futures W/L | 57% (93/70) |
| 51% (88/172) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (129/237) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 35% (14/40) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 61% (22/36) |
| 40% (17/42) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (34/64) |
| 86% (87/75) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (123/110) |
| 14% (87/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (123/13) |
| 16% (86/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (115/20) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
